posted by on Aug 31
In yet another BP oil spill lawsuit, Corliss Gallo is standing for plaintiffs who are suing for punitive damages in a BP class action lawsuit. BP and other companies involved with the Macondo oil well in the Gulf, which suffered a leak last April 2010, are named as defendants in the BP class action lawsuit, which was filed August 20, 2010. The other companies are Halliburton, Transocean LTD, and Cameron International.
Corliss Gallo et al. will seek punitive damages based on alleged gross negligence which harmed their property, as well as negligence during cleanup efforts which left property trampled. Corliss Gallo owns property on Grand Terre Island and claims his land was degraded by the BP oil spill, and further degraded by workers during the cleanup efforts after the spill.
Punitive damages are a controversial topic when it comes to oil spills. After the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, some Alaska fishermen and others were awarded $5 billion in punitive damages by a court. Later, the Supreme Court reduced the punitive damages to $507 million. $507 million was the amount of actual, compensatory damages suffered by the plaintiffs. In other words, the Supreme Court at the time was laying rules dictating a one-t0-one ration between compensatory damages and punitive damages.
The Supreme Court in that case stated that only when reckless profiteering, or reckless behavior in order to increase profits, would a higher ratio be granted. That ration is three to one, punitive to compensatory damages. And that is what is being sought in the current BP class action lawsuit this month.
The big question is whether the three-to-one ratio for punitive damages will be warranted in this particular BP class action lawsuit. Lawyers on the Plaintiffs’ side will have to show egregious behavior for profit. Reports from the US Coast Guard and Congressional hearings will be used to show that defendants took risks and didn’t fix equipment in order to make a quick buck.

